Use this url to cite publication: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12512/117101
Options
The Difference of oxidative stress readings in patients diagnosed with chronic heart failure / Mongirdienė Aušra, Agnė Liuizė, Karčiauskaitė Dovilė, Mazgelytė Eglė, Liekis Arūnas, Sadauskienė Ilona
Type of publication
Tezės kitame recenzuojamame leidinyje / Theses in other peer-reviewed publication (T1e)
Author(s)
Mazgelytė, Eglė | |
Title
The Difference of oxidative stress readings in patients diagnosed with chronic heart failure / Mongirdienė Aušra, Agnė Liuizė, Karčiauskaitė Dovilė, Mazgelytė Eglė, Liekis Arūnas, Sadauskienė Ilona
Publisher (trusted)
Lithuanian University of Health Sciences |
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI AG) |
Date Issued
Date Issued |
---|
2023-02-10 |
Extent
p. 31-31.
Is part of
Medicina : Abstracts of the International Scientific Conference on Medicine organized within the frame of the 81st International Scientific Conference of the University of Latvia : 10 February 2023, Riga / University of Latvia ; Editor-in-Chief Edgaras Stankevičius. Kaunas ; Basel : LSMU ; MDPI, 2023, vol. 59, suppl. 1.
Version
Originalus / Original
Description
Oral presentations. Cardiovascular and regenerative medicine
Field of Science
Abstract
Background. With respect to structural and functional cardiac disorders, heart failure (HF) is divided into HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). HfrEF is known to be the outcome of myocardial ischemia and infarction. Notably, HFpEF is associated with dysregulated metabolism and chronic hypertension, contributing to oxidative stress and myocardial dysfunction. Oxidative stress (an imbalance between the increased formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and the elimination or neutralization of ROS by an antioxidant system) plays an important role in the development of chronic HF and correlates with left ventricle dysfunction and hypertrophy in the failing heart. So, oxidative and antioxidative stress biomarker levels should be higher in HFpEF. Aim. The aim was to compare oxidative stress (nitrotyrosine, dityrosine, protein carbonyl, malondialdehyde, oxidized HDL) and antioxidative biomarker (total plasma antioxidant capacity, catalase (CAT)) levels in the blood between HFrEF and HFpEF patient groups. Methods. A total of 60 CHF patients were enrolled in the study and divided into two groups: HFpEF of <40% (n=27) and HFrEF of ≥40% (n=33). Nitrotyrosine, dityrosine, protein carbonyl, malondialdehyde, oxidized high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL) and antioxidative readings’ (total plasma antioxidant capacity, catalase (CAT)) concentrations were measured in the blood. Results. No statistically significant differences between the groups in the aforementioned variables were observed in the current study. Further, we divided the entire study sample into two groups based on the median values of malondialdehyde, protein carbonyl and oxidized HDL levels. No statistically significant differences of serum oxidative/antioxidative stress markers and left ventricular ejection fraction values were found between the groups of different malondialdehyde concentration (≤114.29 vs. >114.29 μg/L), different protein carbonyl (≤259.95 vs. >259.95 U/mL) and oxidized HDL levels (≤3.06 vs. >3.06 pg/L). There was no correlation between the readings too. Conclusion. Oxidative stress and antioxidative biomarker levels in the blood between HFrEF andHFpEF patient groups do not differ.
Type of document
type::text::conference output::conference proceedings::conference paper
ISSN (of the container)
1648-9233
1648-9233
Other Identifier(s)
(LSMU ALMA)991695386407106
Coverage Spatial
Latvija / Latvia (LV)
Language
Anglų / English (en)