A comparison between digital and conventional full removable dental prostheses fabrications for maxillaryedentulous dental arch: systematic review of literature
Nasir, Louai Hassan |
Recenzentas / Reviewer | |
Komisijos narys / Committee Member | |
Komisijos narys / Committee Member | |
Komisijos narys / Committee Member | |
Komisijos narys / Committee Member | |
Komisijos narys / Committee Member | |
Komisijos narys / Committee Member |
Aim. To compare the fabrication of digital and conventional maxillary full removable dental prostheses with regard to their clinical performance, accuracy, retention and fit, speech and esthetics,fabrication time, patient/prosthodontists’ satisfaction as well as fabrication-related complications.
Materials and methods. A search of English literature from 2007 to 2017 was conducted in the PubMed, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, Scopus and Cochrane Library databases for Mesh and free text termer. The search resulted in 1552 articles. The articles were filtered and then reviewed at title, abstract, and full text levels and the duplicates were sorted out. After following the inclusion/exclusion criteria, 5 articles comparing the two types of interventions were left and included in the review.
Results. 5 studies were selected for the qualitative analysis. Higher scores for the digital compared to the conventional complete removable dental prostheses (CRDPs) were expressed by the participants in several studies with respect to clinical performance, accuracy, and retention and fit. No significant difference between conventional and digital CDs with regard to esthetics and phonetics/speech was shown by 3 studies. Significantly higher patient/prosthodontists’ satisfaction and preference for digital CRDPs were also reported in two studies. Only one study showed no significant difference betwen CRDPs fabricated by the digital and conventional methods regarding the denture stability and comfort as well as patient/prosthodontists’ satisfaction and preference. Less fabrication time and higher technique accuracy offered by the digital method were reported by two studies, while one study reported longer working time for the digital procedure. Complications and problems encountered during the CRDPs fabrication by the digital method were also reported in three studies.
Conclusion. The results reported by several of the clinical studies, comparing the digital and conventional CRDPs productions, included in this review reveal better denture processing accuracy, retention, functional performance, time efficiency and higher patient/prosthodontists’ preference and satisafaction with the digital CD.
Skaitmeniniu ir standartiniu būdu gamintų viršutinio žandikaulio pilnų plokštelinių protezų lyginamoji analizė. Sistematinė apžvalga